Since April 2018, the ascension of Abiy Ahmed as prime
minister of Ethiopia has ushered in a wave of national optimism. The new prime
minister has moved quickly to open political space, promote human rights, and
negotiate peace with neighboring Eritrea. However, behind the positive
headlines—and indeed positive measures that merit international support—a major
humanitarian crisis has unfolded in the south of the country. Over the past
year, inter-communal violence has displaced hundreds of thousands Ethiopians. At
the outset of the crisis, Prime
Minister Abiy’s administration took laudable action in
collaborating openly with United
Nations agencies and other humanitarian
organizations to mobilize and coordinate a response to the plight of internally
displaced persons (IDPs). Unfortunately, however, it has more recently taken steps
that have compounded IDPs’ suffering by pressing for their return home before
conditions were suitable.
As political ground shifted at the federal level,
long-standing grievances between ethnic groups over land, borders, and rights
re-emerged in an explosion of violence in southern Ethiopia.
Significant displacement occurred between April and June
along the internal border of Oromia and the Southern Nations, Nationalities,
and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR).
In September, a team from Refugees International (RI)
traveled to southern Oromia and SNNPR to assess the situation of the displaced
and the response. The team found that while the government made a proactive
effort to partner with international humanitarian organizations early on, this
positive trend was soon upended. In late August, the government began to restrict
the delivery of assistance, telling IDPs that they would only receive help if
they returned home. However, because many return areas were destroyed in the
violence and remained insecure, a number of IDPs who tried to return home now
find themselves living in secondary displacement sites.
The government must take four key steps to address the
crisis. First, it must refrain from carrying out additional premature,
non-voluntary returns and allow aid organizations to provide assistance in both
areas of displacement and areas of return. Second, it must establish a clear and
transparent plan for voluntary and sustainable returns. Third, the government
should implement this return plan in close coordination with relief
organizations. Fourth, it must inform
IDPs who have already been returned that they can live where
they feel safest and that aid provision will be need-based. Donors and
humanitarians must advocate for these changes while working with the government
to support an overall improvement in its response to conflict IDPs.
No comments:
Post a Comment